| | |
 |
Comparing Stunnix Advanced Web Server and Stunnix Perl Web Server
These two products are both perfectly suited for desktop applications
and for running directly on read-only media like CD, DVD and USB FlashDrive.
They share the same file layout, same configuration file for wrapper scripts,
both run Perl XCGI scripts
User-triggerred stopping of the server works in a similar way on both products.
Advantages of SPWS over SAWS are
- Applicable when running Perl scripts ONLY:
SPWS works on all platforms where the Perl interpreter is installed or for
which it's included on CDROM. This
means you can create a product in Perl, use SPWS for GUI and the product will work
on every Unix-like operating system (Solaris, HP-UX, xBSD, SGI).
Additionally, this web server is tiny.
Advantages of SAWS over SPWS are
- It takes less time to port to SAWS than to SPWS.
- A Site that uses SAWS works much faster than a site running SPWS.
- Many pre-existing Apache loadable modules can be used with SAWS.
- SAWS is much more flexible and offers much more features than SPWS, including
support for Python and Java (Tomcat).
|  |
| | |
So in most cases the use of SAWS is much more applicable
over the use of SPWS.
